Your cart is empty
Free shipping on all US orders
Free shipping on all orders
The debate has raged for years about which one is better; organically farmed foods, or conventionally grown varieties?
Regardless of which side of the fence you find yourself on, there are solid arguments to be made for both of these groups.
In this blog post, we take a deeper look at the two to help you determine which one is better based on your circumstances.
Conventional foods are products that are grown, processed, and handled using standard agricultural practices, which often involve the use of synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and other modern farming technologies. Conventional farming is the predominant method of food production in most countries and typically focuses on maximizing crop yields and efficiency.
As you can guess, this method of farming does not give much thought to the distant future, or achieving the highest nutritional benefit, but rather on quantity.
Organic foods, on the other hand, are those products that are grown, processed, and handled following a set of specific standards and guidelines to minimize the use of synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and other artificial additives.
These standards are regulated by organizations such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in the US and other similar entities in different countries.
Organic farming practices emphasize ecological balance, biodiversity, and sustainable agriculture over the long term.
Albeit generally minor, there are differences in the nutritional spectrum when comparing the two. For instance:
When comparing the nutritional content of organic and conventional foods, there is an ongoing debate on whether there is a significant difference in the levels of vitamins and minerals.
Some studies suggest that organic foods may have slightly higher levels of certain nutrients, such as vitamin C, iron, and magnesium. This may be attributed to the soil fertility management practices used in organic farming, which can have a positive impact on the nutritional quality of the produce.
Our best-selling superfood powder, Field Of Greens, is made entirely of organic ingredients, to give you the highest degree of safety and quality to improve your health.
However, other research indicates that there is no notable difference in the overall nutritional content of organic and conventional foods. It is essential to note that the nutrient levels in any food can be influenced by various factors, such as soil type, climate, crop variety, and harvest time.
Therefore, the nutritional differences between organic and conventional foods may not be solely due to farming practices, and the overall impact on human health is still inconclusive.
Antioxidants are compounds that help protect the body from damage caused by free radicals, which can contribute to chronic diseases and aging. Some studies have shown that organic foods contain higher levels of certain antioxidants, such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds, compared to their conventional counterparts.
This could be due to the lower use of synthetic pesticides in organic farming, which may prompt plants to produce more of their own natural defense compounds.
However, it is worth mentioning that the overall antioxidant content can vary widely depending on the type of food, growing conditions, and other factors.
Additionally, the increased antioxidant content in organic foods may not necessarily translate to significant health benefits, as the human body's ability to absorb and utilize these compounds can vary greatly, or be impaired owing to the presence of anti-nutrients.
One of the main concerns about conventional foods is the presence of pesticide residues. Synthetic pesticides are widely used in conventional agriculture to protect crops from pests, diseases, and weeds.
While they can be effective in increasing crop output, some pesticides have been linked to various health issues, including hormone disruption, neurological problems, and certain types of cancer.
Pesticide residues on foods can pose risks to human health, particularly in vulnerable populations like children, pregnant women, and those with weakened immune systems. Chronic exposure to low levels of pesticides has been associated with an increased risk of developing chronic diseases, such as Parkinson's disease and certain cancers.
In order to protect consumers from potential health risks associated with pesticide residues, regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in the EU establish maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various pesticides in food products.
MRLs are set based on scientific assessments of the potential risks to human health and are designed to ensure that the levels of pesticide residues in foods are safe for consumption.
Organic foods, on the other hand, have stricter regulations on pesticide use and generally contain far lower levels of pesticide residues than conventional foods. This may be a significant factor for consumers who are concerned about the potential health risks associated with pesticide exposure.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are plants or animals whose genetic material has been altered in a laboratory using techniques like gene splicing, which allows scientists to transfer specific genes from one organism to another.
This process can result in organisms with desired traits, such as increased resistance to pests, diseases, or environmental conditions, or improved nutritional content.
The use of GMOs in conventional food production has sparked a debate about their potential impact on human health. Some concerns include the possibility of allergenicity, antibiotic resistance, and unintentional changes in nutritional content. Critics argue that the long-term effects of consuming GMOs are not yet fully understood and that further research is needed to ensure their safety.
Proponents of GMOs, on the other hand, maintain that they have been extensively studied and are safe for human consumption. They argue that GMOs can help address food security issues by increasing crop yields, reducing the need for chemical pesticides, and improving the nutritional quality of certain foods.
It is worth noting that the scientific consensus, including organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Medical Association (AMA), states that GMOs currently available on the market are as safe for human consumption as their non-GMO counterparts. However, they also emphasize the importance of continuous research and monitoring to ensure the safety of GMOs in the long term- currently not established.
Conventional farming practices often prioritize short-term productivity and efficiency, which can lead to soil degradation over time. Some common practices that contribute to soil degradation in conventional agriculture include:
Organic farming practices can help to minimize water pollution by reducing the use of synthetic chemicals and promoting natural methods of pest and nutrient management.
By using organic fertilizers and cover crops, organic farmers can reduce the risk of nutrient leaching into waterways. Additionally, the reduced use of synthetic pesticides in organic agriculture helps to protect water quality by minimizing the presence of harmful chemicals in the surface and groundwater.
Conventional farming practices can contribute to water pollution through the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Excessive application of these chemicals can result in runoff and leaching, which can contaminate water sources and harm aquatic ecosystems.
Nutrient pollution from agricultural activities, particularly nitrogen, and phosphorus, can lead to eutrophication, a process that causes oxygen depletion in water bodies and can result in the loss of aquatic life.
Conventional farming practices can have a negative impact on biodiversity due to habitat loss, monoculture, and the use of synthetic chemicals. The large-scale cultivation of single crops can result in the loss of diverse habitats, which can lead to declines in the populations of pollinators, beneficial insects, and other wildlife. The use of synthetic pesticides can also harm non-target species, including beneficial insects, birds, and aquatic life.
Additionally, the widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in conventional agriculture has raised concerns about potential impacts on biodiversity.
For instance, the cultivation of herbicide-resistant crops can lead to increased herbicide use, which may harm non-target plants and associated wildlife. There are also concerns about the potential for gene flow between GMO crops and wild relatives, which could affect the genetic diversity of native plant populations.
The taste of food is a subjective experience that can be influenced by various factors, including preferences, cultural background, and prior experiences. Some consumers perceive that organic foods taste better than conventional foods, often attributing this to the absence of synthetic chemicals and the use of more natural farming practices.
In some cases, organic produce may indeed have a more intense or "natural" flavor due to factors such as soil health, slower growth rates, and the absence of chemical residues.
However, studies comparing the taste of organic and conventional foods have yielded mixed results, with some studies finding no significant differences and others showing slight variations. Taste preferences can be highly subjective as well, and it is worth noting that factors such as freshness, ripeness, and storage conditions can have a more significant impact on taste than the method of production.
The appearance of food, including its size, shape, color, and overall visual appeal, can also be influenced by farming practices. Organic foods may sometimes appear less uniform or "perfect" than conventional foods due to the absence of synthetic chemicals and the use of traditional plant varieties.
Organic produce may also have a higher likelihood of blemishes, as they are not treated with synthetic pesticides that protect conventional crops from pests and diseases.
For some people, this appearance is a dealbreaker as they prefer smoother, unblemished produce.
Conventional foods, on the other hand, often benefit from the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and GMOs that can result in larger, more uniform, and visually appealing produce. However, it is important to note that appearance does not necessarily correlate with taste or nutritional quality.
Consumer preferences and expectations play a significant role in the perception of taste and appearance of organic and conventional foods. Some consumers may prefer the more "natural" appearance of organic foods and associate it with better taste and higher nutritional value, while others may prioritize the uniformity and visual appeal of conventional produce.
Organic foods are generally more expensive than their conventional counterparts. This price difference can be attributed to several factors that influence the production and distribution of organic products, including:
The availability of organic and conventional foods varies greatly depending on the region, influenced by factors such as local agricultural practices, consumer demand, and distribution infrastructure. Suffice it to say, many places still do not have access to organic produce, especially in lower to middle-income countries.
What it ultimately comes down to is what you’re looking for and what you will settle on. If you’re after sustainable, ecologically friendly, safer and (potentially) healthier produce, organic is the way to go.
On the other hand, conventional produce is cheaper, might be more visually appealing, and at a lower cost, but at the risk of damage to health and the environment.
The superior choice is organic, but that’s a decision nobody else can make for you.